Obama's Iowa organizing

Iowa is not always about giving the best speeches and having the best advertising campaigns (though there is an argument to be made for Obama on both those fronts).  The number of voters in Iowa means that it is a state which can be won with a good old-fashioned field program.  A recent article from The Politico talked about Obama's field program and the real effort that is going into it.

Barack Obama began his speech in an odd and important way, a way that did not make a single news story.

Obama was delivering a major address, reminding voters of his early opposition to the Iraq war. It was big deal speech. There were prepared texts handed out to the press and everything.

But Obama's first words were not in his text, even though they may have been the most important words he spoke all day.

"If you have not yet signed up as a Barack Obama supporter, hopefully after the speech you will," he told the crowd at the Polk County Convention Complex.

"Fill out one of those cards. We'll have volunteers all across the doors. You won't be able to get out without seeing one of these cards."

Pretty mundane stuff, right? Which is why most candidates don't bother with it. Especially not in a speech being covered by the national press, with six TV cameras grinding away.

But that Obama did bother with it is the most important sign I have seen that he actually understands Iowa.

It seems like a simple thing, it really doesn't seem like the kind of thing that could win an election... but it can.  On these cards the campaign collects e-mail addresses, phone numbers, and addresses.  This will allow the campaign to get voters to the caucus sites.  The Politico article goes on to say:

While I was in Des Moines, I talked to Gordon and Monica Fischer. Gordon was the Democratic Party chairman here during the last presidential election. Monica worked in the administration of former Gov. Tom Vilsack.

Every Democratic presidential campaign called the Fischers this time to ask for their support. Last week, the couple announced they were going to work for Obama.

One reason, they told me, is they think Obama is the best candidate, with the greatest chance of winning.

But there was another reason.

"He is the best-organized in Iowa," Gordon said. "He has the best ground game."

"And his people," Monica said, "are relentless."

Relentless is good. Real good. Relentless works in Iowa.

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/100 7/6174.html


Poll
Who will win Iowa?
Barack Obama
Hillary Clinton
John Edwards
Bill Richardson
Joe Biden
Chris Dodd

Votes: 33
Results : Vote Link : Polls

Display:


Right on... (2.00 / 1)

More on Obama strategy from today's AP article:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071005/ap_p o/obama_s_plan

The Obama strategy for Iowa, outlined by Hildebrand in an interview with The Associated Press and confirmed by other advisers, is three-pronged:

1. Keep Clinton's support down.

Obama has to be careful about how he makes the case against Clinton, since he's campaigning on the need for a new kind of politics of hope instead of rivals tearing each other down. He's been taking the indirect approach - criticizing the actions of the Washington establishment and letting voters and the media make the connection to Clinton.

``People hold Barack to a different standard in politics because of his own rhetoric,'' Hildebrand said. ``He can't turn to Hillary and say, `You can't get elected because you're too polarizing. ... It's got to be in his own voice. It's got to be measured. It's got to be appropriate. It's got to be factual.''

2. Keep Edwards from surging ahead.

Obama's advisers insist they do not see Edwards as a threat for the nomination even if he wins Iowa because he doesn't have enough money to continue an aggressive campaign in the 24 other states that will follow within a month. But if Edwards emerges as the top competitor with Clinton after the Iowa results, it could squeeze Obama out.

That's why the campaign spent so much time trying to keep Edwards from getting the endorsement of the Service Employees International Union last month. Anything that gives Edwards a boost comes at a cost to Obama, and so far SEIU has withheld its endorsement.

3. Continue building Obama's support among both traditional and nontraditional voters.

Obama will have plenty of resources to air television ads across all the early voting states, plus he has a large field staff in those states working intensively to recruit supporters and keep them on board. Hildebrand said 1,900 new supporters signed up the week before the interview, more than half of whom had never caucused before.

The campaign is trying to drum up supporters who are often overlooked in politics, with much of the effort geared toward blacks and young people - even high school seniors.

``If they show up every Wednesday night to volunteer in your local office, do you think they aren't going to show up on election night?'' Hildebrand said, wearing a T-shirt that said ``Building a Grassroots Movement'' with the Obama campaign logo.


What's the Point?
by Vermonter on Fri Oct 05, 2007 at 12:39:27 PM EST

Obama leaving something to be desired? (none / 0)

I can't remember if it was Yepsin or Fineman on Hardball the other night (both on at the same time) that said Obama has not been sharp on the stump in Iowa.

They did give him high marks for spending a lot of time there and doing the retail politics.


by dpANDREWS on Fri Oct 05, 2007 at 01:12:59 PM EST

Re: Obama leaving something to be desired? (none / 0)

I'm guessing more likely Fineman than Yepsen.  Yepsen has been comparing Obama to Kennedy recently.

http://blogs.dmregister.com/?cat=33


by Obama08 on Fri Oct 05, 2007 at 01:19:36 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama leaving something to be desired? (none / 0)

"Invoking Kennedy imagery is a delicate thing for any politician to do but Obama succeeded in pulling it off."

--- David Yepsin

Hardly Yepsin comparing Obama to Kennedy.

I personally think Obama is more like Quayle than Kennedy.  Young and inexperienced and in a position too early.


by dpANDREWS on Fri Oct 05, 2007 at 03:28:59 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama leaving something to be desired? (none / 0)

I'm not sure that trotting out 79 year old Ted Sorensen with died black hair is the best way to signal a clean break from the "tired old ways of Washington insiders".

Sorensen was inside the beltway before their was a beltway.


by hwc on Fri Oct 05, 2007 at 03:40:57 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Comparing yourself to Kennedy is desperate (none / 0)

In my mind it is just plain desperate.

If Obama is supposed to be all of that and a bag of chips why does he up to try and compare himself to a guy who has been dead for 40 years.

It is like when Bush tries to compare himself to Truman or Tootsie trys to compare himself to Churchill .... Desperate nonsense.


by dpANDREWS on Fri Oct 05, 2007 at 03:47:06 PM EST
[ Parent ]

it wasn't obama comparing himself to kennedy... (2.00 / 2)

it was a trusted aide of kennedy's who one presumes should know.  now i understand why you don't like it, but your rationale is just plain silly...


"Anyone who voted for me or caucused for me has so much more in common with Senator Obama than Senator McCain." -- Hillary Clinton
by bored now on Fri Oct 05, 2007 at 06:11:03 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama leaving something to be desired? (none / 0)

I think you meant dyed black hair, not died.

It's great that you are a tireless advocate for Hillary Clinton who I will support with great enthusiasm if she is the nominee but don't diss Ted Sorenson who is a hero of the Democratic Party and a Great American.  I respect Clinton supporters, you should do the same.


by howardpark on Fri Oct 05, 2007 at 08:59:53 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama leaving something to be desired? (none / 0)

I am offended when a Democrat compares a fellow Democrat to a Republican, for any reason, but that's jmho.

FYI, there is a very interesting read about what if Bill Clinton had run when he was unexperienced and unelectable.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/huffpost/2007100 1/cm_huffpost/066524


Dare to be free.
by misscee on Fri Oct 05, 2007 at 03:47:21 PM EST
[ Parent ]

That was dicey (none / 0)

But I didn't consider it a smear ... more of where they were in their careers.  Its not like I used a rightwing talking point.   If anything I sort of invoked a famous facial by a Democrat ... Lloyd Benson.

I think, if I am not mistaken, Bill Clinton could say to Obama, I have met John F. Kennedy and you are no John F. Kennedy.   That would be classic ... but of course would never happen.  

Didn't CLinton meet Kennedy when he was young?  Not sure.


by dpANDREWS on Fri Oct 05, 2007 at 09:05:16 PM EST
[ Parent ]

yes, at boys nation... (none / 0)

it's a famous picture (at least, after he became president)...


"Anyone who voted for me or caucused for me has so much more in common with Senator Obama than Senator McCain." -- Hillary Clinton
by bored now on Fri Oct 05, 2007 at 09:47:45 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: yes, at boys nation... (none / 0)

Boys Nation?   Dear God, that sounds like some event put on by the Boy Scouts ... or Catholic Priests.

---

JUST KIDDING!!   Little humor never hurt.


by dpANDREWS on Sat Oct 06, 2007 at 01:04:58 AM EST
[ Parent ]

i get the impression it was a big deal... (none / 0)

back then and especially from states like arkansas.  i don't recall florida having a boys state or ever having heard about boys nation before clinton ran.  but it seemed to be a pivotal moment in his life, at least from the hollywood version of it.  very dramatic use of that picture in his 1992 convention film...


"Anyone who voted for me or caucused for me has so much more in common with Senator Obama than Senator McCain." -- Hillary Clinton
by bored now on Sat Oct 06, 2007 at 10:38:15 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama leaving something to be desired? (none / 0)

You make me almost regret I once retracted an inappropriate cast-off remark comparing Hillary to Margaret Thatcher.


by Shaun Appleby on Fri Oct 05, 2007 at 05:18:42 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama's Iowa organizing (none / 0)

Gave this a recommend as good field work never gets enough respect or talked about enough either. That said I'd heard from a friend in Iowa that (at least a couple months back) Obama's people weren't doing a great job on the phones at all.

They'd call and ask if the person was supporting Obama and if they said no then they'd just say thanks and bye rather than trying to perhaps poke around as to why not and change their mind or at least see if Obama may be able to be their second choice. Second choices are critical in a caucus especially if their first choice is a minor candidate likely to either drop out before Iowa or not be viable in their precinct.


by Quinton on Fri Oct 05, 2007 at 05:12:55 PM EST

just a few days ago (none / 0)

I got another "phone survey" asking my preferences. It was just a few questions. I always ask at the end who is paying for the survey, and in this case (as on several other occasions) the answer was Obama for America. It's true, the caller basically said thanks and bye when I said I was for Edwards.

But that sounded like a survey done by some national phone bank.

The local field organizers for Obama have done a much better job on the phone. They have even managed to keep straight that my husband is undecided but I am for Edwards. As in, I got a phone call a few weeks back saying, we remember you're for Edwards, but could we please talk to your husband?


John McCain: 100 years in Iraq "would be fine with me."
by desmoinesdem on Fri Oct 05, 2007 at 05:57:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: just a few days ago (2.00 / 1)

He has good people.

I first found out about Obama from a phone call. The volunteer was so nice and polite, that I gave Barack a very small donation right on the spot, telling her that I was waiting to see if Al Gore would run.

She was very appreciative of the donation. We talked for  awhile, and she was short and sweet about why she supported Obama. I felt good about the donation. The letters he has sent me, especially one with a message from Michelle, are actually interesting to read from beginning to end.


Dare to be free.
by misscee on Fri Oct 05, 2007 at 06:16:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama's Iowa organizing (none / 0)

Interesting.  Some things must have been fixed for this good news coming out of Iowa.


by iamready on Fri Oct 05, 2007 at 05:58:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama's Iowa organizing (none / 0)

Wow, comparing Barack Obama to Dan Quayle.  Pretty insightful.


by moodmovesmarkets on Fri Oct 05, 2007 at 07:03:41 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.